If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user

 Actions

Toolkit

Difference between revisions of "Safety and Justice/Navigator"

From SKYbrary Wiki

< Toolkit:Safety and Justice
m
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
You want to get a feel about how to interpret the behaviour of a person related to a safety event. Remember, do not use the outcome of the safety event to judge the behaviour of the individual. Just because the explosion was very big does not mean that the people involved were very bad! So look at the action or intention, not at the consequences!
 
You want to get a feel about how to interpret the behaviour of a person related to a safety event. Remember, do not use the outcome of the safety event to judge the behaviour of the individual. Just because the explosion was very big does not mean that the people involved were very bad! So look at the action or intention, not at the consequences!
  
First, get a broad idea: was the action above or equal, [click left icon] or below expectation [click right icon]?
+
First, get a broad idea: was the action <u>above or equal</u>, [click left icon] or <u>below expectation</u> [click right icon]?
  
 
"Expectation" being the behaviour you would normally observe of a professional.
 
"Expectation" being the behaviour you would normally observe of a professional.
 +
  
 
{|align=center
 
{|align=center
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|align=center|[top of navigator]<br/>[[File:Rate the action.png]]
+
|align=center|[top of navigator]<br/>[[File:Rate the action.png|link=]]
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|align=center|[[File:Good work.png]]
+
|align=center|[[File:Good work.png|link={{SUBJECTPAGENAME}}/Good work]]
 
|
 
|
|align=center|[[File:I have seen better.png]]
+
|align=center|[[File:I have seen better.png|link={{SUBJECTPAGENAME}}/I have seen better]]
 
|}
 
|}
 
|style="width:30%; border:1px solid #aaa; align:center; vertical-align:top" |
 
|style="width:30%; border:1px solid #aaa; align:center; vertical-align:top" |
{| class = 'wikitable' style="width:100%"
 
!Welcome
 
|-
 
|This toolkit supports the interpretation of human behaviour during a safety event. This may help you in implementing a Just Culture, whereby both accountability and organisational learning are optimally achieved. The home page shows the interpretor on the left ready for use, but if you want more information, check out the [[{{PAGENAME}}/Welcome|Welcome]] pages and the [[{{PAGENAME}}/Theory|Theory]] pages first.
 
|}
 
 
{| class = 'wikitable' style="width:100%"
 
{| class = 'wikitable' style="width:100%"
 
!How to use the navigator
 
!How to use the navigator
Line 34: Line 30:
 
Select the most appropriate answer. You will get a chance to compare your outcome with examples from your own and possibly other industries, allowing you to 'calibrate' your thinking and opinion about the action during the safety event.
 
Select the most appropriate answer. You will get a chance to compare your outcome with examples from your own and possibly other industries, allowing you to 'calibrate' your thinking and opinion about the action during the safety event.
  
You can use the up arrow to go back to the previous step in the decision tree; or just use the <backspace> key on your keyboard or the <Back> button on your browser for simpler handling.
+
You can use the <u>up arrow</u> [[File:Up button.png|30px|link=]] to go back to the previous step in the decision tree.
  
You can use the arrow to see what follow-up and consequences for the person in question could apply.
+
You can use the [[File:Next button.png|30px|link=]] <u>next arrow</u> to see what follow-up and consequences for the person in question could apply.
  
 
The following diagram explains the complete structure of the decision flow chart (click on picture for full image in new window). Handy if you want to have the complete overview.
 
The following diagram explains the complete structure of the decision flow chart (click on picture for full image in new window). Handy if you want to have the complete overview.
[[File:Navigator.png|none|250px|link=]]
+
[[File:Navigator.png|center|250px]]
 
|}
 
|}
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 19:54, 16 February 2013

General purpose navigator

You want to get a feel about how to interpret the behaviour of a person related to a safety event. Remember, do not use the outcome of the safety event to judge the behaviour of the individual. Just because the explosion was very big does not mean that the people involved were very bad! So look at the action or intention, not at the consequences!

First, get a broad idea: was the action above or equal, [click left icon] or below expectation [click right icon]?

"Expectation" being the behaviour you would normally observe of a professional.


[top of navigator]
Rate the action.png
Good work.png I have seen better.png
How to use the navigator
This is a general purpose navigator that has been inspired on a combination of theoretical models. Our purpose is to give you a quick method to get to a broad interpretation of observed behaviour. From there, you can go into more detail by delving into established safety culture models for further analysis and for appropriate remedies.

This "navigator" module will take you through a set of structured questions.

Select the most appropriate answer. You will get a chance to compare your outcome with examples from your own and possibly other industries, allowing you to 'calibrate' your thinking and opinion about the action during the safety event.

You can use the up arrow Up button.png to go back to the previous step in the decision tree.

You can use the Next button.png next arrow to see what follow-up and consequences for the person in question could apply.

The following diagram explains the complete structure of the decision flow chart (click on picture for full image in new window). Handy if you want to have the complete overview.

Navigator.png