If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user

 Actions

Main Page

From SKYbrary Wiki

Operational Issues

textAir Ground Communication Air Ground Communication Airspace Infringement Airspace Infringement Wildlife Strike Wildlife Strike Controlled Flight Into Terrain Controlled Flight Into Terrain Fire Smoke and Fumes Fire Smoke & Fumes Ground Operations Ground Operations Airworthiness Airworthiness Level Bust Level Bust Loss of Control Loss of Control Loss of Separation Loss of Separation Runway Excursion Runway Excursion Runway Incursion Runway Incursion Wake Vortex Turbulence Wake Vortex Turbulence Weather Weather Emergency and Contingency Emergency and Contingency Unmanned Aerial Systems Unmanned Aerial Systems

Human Performance

Human Behaviour Human Behaviour Design Philosophy Design Philosophy Human Performance Modelling Human Performance Modelling Organisation and Human Performance Organisation and Human Performance Human Factors Training Human Factors Training Aeromedical Aeromedical OGHFA OGHFA

Enhancing Safety

Cabin Safety Cabin Safety Flight Technical Flight Technical Safety Management Safety Management Safety Nets Safety Nets Theory of Flight Theory of Flight General Aviation Safety Enhancements General Aviation Safety Enhancements Safety Culture Safety Culture Just Culture Just Culture ICAO ADREP ICAO ADREP CAST SE Plan CAST SE Plan Accident Investigation Accident Investigation Helicopter Safety Helicopter Safety

Safety Regulations

Rules Rules Certification Certification Personnel Licensing Personnel Licensing Monitoring & Oversight Monitoring & Oversight Single European Sky Single European Sky ESARRs ESARRs Human_Error_in_Aviation_and_Legal_Process Human Error & Legal Process

Highlighted Article

A persistently poor operational safety record should not be ignored

posted 4 January 2021 in Category:Accidents and Incidents

On 29 November 2018, an aircraft landed on a temporarily closed section of the runway at Dubrovnik after a visual approach in benign weather conditions. The Investigation found that the flight crew had not carried out a sufficient pre-flight review of current and available information about a major multi-phase runway reconstruction there which they were familiar with. The opportunity for better advance and real time communication with aircraft operators and their flight crew and the benefit of the recommended ‘X’ marking at the beginning of any temporarily closed part of a runway, omitted in this case, was noted.

Read more »

References

Thematic

Toolkits

Safety knowledge contributed by: Logo-airpilots.pngLogo-cranfield.pngLogo-RMetS.pngLogo-SMICG.png

Retrieved from "https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=159558"