If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user
In-Flight Icing: Guidance for Controllers
From SKYbrary Wiki
There is no set of ready, out-of-the-box rules to be followed universally. As with any unusual or emergency situation, controllers should exercise their best judgment and expertise when dealing with the apparent consequences of in flight icing. A generic checklist for handling unusual situations is readily available from EUROCONTROL but it is not intended to be exhaustive and is best used in conjunction with local ATC procedures.
This article provides guidance for controllers on what to expect from an aircraft experiencing the effects of in-flight icing and some considerations which will enable the controller, not only to provide as much support as possible to the aircraft concerned, but also maintain the safety of other aircraft in the vicinity and of the service provision in general.
Useful to Know
In-flight icing poses serious threat to the safety of a flight. Water droplets accumulate on the airframe as ice under specific conditions. The ice deposits alter the wing profile and disrupt the flow of air. This drastically changes flight parameters such as lift, drag, controllability, etc. As drag increases, lift rapidly decreases - a natural pilot action to compensate for this would be to apply power and increase angle of attack to maintain level, however this leads to even faster ice accumulation as larger airframe surface is exposed. Ice formations on wing and control surfaces can lead to increased stall speed, sudden uncontrolled pitch or roll with difficult recovery and, potentially, eventual loss of control.
Moderate or severe icing conditions could overwhelm the anti-ice system commonly fitted on modern aircraft. Safe continuation of the flight could become impossible.
Some hazards associated with in-flight icing include:
- Adverse Aerodynamic Effects
- Blockage of pitot tubes and static vents
- Communications problems.
For further information, see the separate article on the Aerodynamic Effects of In-Flight Icing.
Type and speed of ice formation is, in part, a function of the variables of the cloud liquid water content, the mean effective diameter of the cloud droplets and the ambient air temperature. The shape of the aerofoil and the speed of the aircraft also directly affect the rate of ice accretion. The following table shows the risk classification, depending on the cloud type and temperature:
|In-flight icing risk||Cumulus clouds||Stratiform clouds||Rain and drizzle|
|High||0° to -20°C||0° to -15°C||0°C and below|
|Medium||-20° to -40°C||-15° to -30°C|
|Low||< than -40°C||< than -30°C|
Figure 1: In-flight icing risk in various atmospheric conditions. Source: Aircraft Icing Handbook, CAA, NZ (www.caa.govt.nz)
According to studies conducted on icing-related incidents and accidents, “the worst continuous icing conditions are found near the freezing level in heavy stratified clouds, or in rain, with icing possible up to 8,000 ft higher. Icing is rare above this higher altitude as the droplets in the clouds are already frozen. In cumuliform clouds with strong updrafts, however large water droplets may be carried to high altitudes and structural icing is possible up to very high altitudes. Further, in cumuliform cloud the freezing level may be distorted upwards in updrafts and downwards in downdrafts, often by many thousands of feet. This leads to the potential for severe icing to occur at almost any level.” (Aircraft Icing Handbook pp2, see Further Reading)
The following icing classification is derived from the same source and is based solely on the speed of ice formation:
- Trace: Ice becomes perceptible. Rate of accumulation of ice is slightly greater than the rate of loss due to sublimation.
- Light: The rate of accumulation may create a problem for flight in this environment for one hour. Unless encountered for one hour or more, de-icing/anti-icing equipment and/or heading or altitude change not required.
- Moderate: The rate of accumulation is such that even short encounters become potentially hazardous. De-icing/anti-icing required to remove/prevent accumulation or heading or attitude change required.
- Severe: The rate of accumulation is such that de-icing/ anti-icing equipment fails to reduce or control the hazard. De-icing/anti-icing required, immediate heading or altitude change required.
In-flight icing could lead to many problems, quite different in nature, such as:
- Reduced lift - Increased drag
- Uncommanded and uncontrolled roll - roll upset
- Higher stall speed at lower angles of attack
- Structural damage due induced vibration
Anticipated Impact on Crew
The stress level for the crew on a flight with icing conditions is significantly higher than during a routine one. The pilots should maintain high situational awareness and closely monitor ice formation as immediate diversion could be necessary.
The procedures for avoiding icing conditions include autopilot disengagement, change in altitude/heading or both and search for areas clear of clouds or with warmer temperature. All these pose significant amount of workload to the crew.
Once the first signs of flow disruptions are shown, the crew will put all efforts and attention to regain control. Therefore, during this phase an ATCO could expect broken, incoherent communication with the aircraft.
Suggested Controller’s Actions
Best practice embedded in the ASSIST principle could be followed (A - Acknowledge; S - Separate, S - Silence; I - Inform, S - Support, T - Time):
A - acknowledge the problem, ask for the crews’ intentions
S - separate the aircraft from other traffic, provide accurate and optimal vectors
S - silence the non-urgent calls (as required)
I - inform other aircraft and all concerned parties according to local procedures of the reported icing
S - support the flight experiencing icing with any information requested and deemed necessary
T - provide, in a timely fashion, a revised clearance to move the affected aircraft out of the icing conditions.
In addition, the controller might be required to:
- Take all necessary action to safeguard all aircraft concerned
- Suggest a heading
- State the minimum safe altitude
- Provide separation or issue essential traffic information, as appropriate
- Make an emergency broadcast
- Immediate change of level and/or heading
- Limitation in rate of climb/descent
- Higher speed
In icing conditions:
- Avoid holding - or provide holding flight levels/altitudes away from the 0°C isotherm.
- Enable continuous climb after departure - plan ahead - correct coordination between Twr/App/Control will ensure unrestricted climb.
- Keep safety strip clear - due to higher stall speed, aircraft experiencing severe/moderate icing are likely to maintain a higher approach speed. Tower controllers should keep runway safety strips clear during such landings. For details consult the Runway Excursion article.
- AIREP to other ACFT, other units and MET - ATCOs should relay all pilot’s reports for adverse MET conditions to other aircraft concerned and to the meteorological office. Often, even the less time-consuming ‘resume’ on the operating frequency provides valuable information for the pilots.
In icing conditions it may be appropriate to remind trainees or less experienced pilots of turboprop aircraft to:
- Check anti-icing and de-icing systems
- Pitot heating
- Stall warner heating
- Carburettor heating
- Propeller heating / de-icing
- Wing anti-ice / de-ice
- Windshield heating
- Descent with higher power setting to increase bleed air supply
- Higher approach/landing speed due to increase of stalling speed
- Pre-flight information - Crews should be supplied with latest weather information - they should also take the meteo-conditions into consideration while preparing for the flight.
- Anti-icing, De-icing - Anti-icing and de-icing procedures should be performed with full compliance to the requirements. The tower controller should take into account the hold-over time that is reported by the crew.
- Personal awareness - ATCOs should stay alert for any extraordinary climb/descent. They should be ready to provide climb/descent to affected traffic and allow space for horizontal manoeuvres. The aircraft experiencing severe icing would certainly need increased separation as its flying characteristics would be degraded.
- Information dissemination - The controller should pass all reports for adverse icing conditions to the incoming traffic. He/she should also pass this information to the meteorological office for further processing and dissemination.
- Guidelines for Controller Training in the Handling of Unusual/Emergency Situations, EUROCONTROL
- ATC Refresher Training Manual, ed.1.0, March 2015, EUROCONTROL
- CAP 745, Aircraft Emergencies, Considerations for air traffic controllers
- Aircraft Icing Handbook, CAA, NZ
- Recommendations for De-Icing / Anti-Icing of Aircraft on the Ground, 27th edition, AEA
- Inflight Icing Educational Objectives for Air Carrier Pilots, AIAA 2003-21
- FAA Safety Recommendation Report - Emergency Training for Air Traffic Controllers
Practical advice for pilots on stall and upset recovery:
- Understanding the Stall Recovery Procedure for Turboprop Airplanes in Icing Conditions, Flight Safety Digest , April 2005, pps 3-19.
- Airplane Upset Recovery - A Test Pilot's View, an article by Captain William Wainwright, Airbus Chief Test Pilot