If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user

 Actions

Glasgow International Airport

From SKYbrary Wiki

EGPF
Airport
ICAO: EGPF – IATA: GLA
Summary
Name Glasgow International Airport
Region Europe
Territory United Kingdom GB.gif
Location Paisley, Scotland
Serving Glasgow
Elevation 7.925 m
26 ft
26 ft7.925 m
Coordinates 55° 52' 5.40" N, 4° 26' 8.73" W
Runways
Designator Length Width Surface ROPS
5/23 2658 m8,720.472 ft
46 m150.919 ft
ASP yes/yes
9/27 1104 m3,622.047 ft
46 m150.919 ft
ASP no/no


METAR
Observation EGPF 282220Z AUTO VRB01KT 2500 BR BKN032 02/01 Q1025
Station Glasgow Airport
Date/Time 28 November 2020 22:20:00
Wind direction °
Wind speed 01 kts
Lowest cloud amount broken clouds
Temperature 2°C
Dew point 1°C
Humidity 93%
QNH 1025 hPa
Weather condition n/a

Glasgow International Airport

ICAO: EGPF IATA: GLA

Description

A domestic and international airport serving the City of Glasgow and the surrounding region.

Climatology

Temperate Marine climate/Oceanic climate (Köppen climate classification Cfb). Moderately cool summer and comparatively warm winter with a temperature range of only 14°C57.2 °F
287.15 K
516.87 °R
. Prevailing south-westerly winds from the Atlantic Ocean.

Maps

Terrain

Loading map...

Airport Layout

Loading map...


Accidents & Serious Incidents at or in vicinity of EGPF

  • A319, vicinity Glasgow UK, 2018 (On 30 September 2018, an Airbus A319 Captain had to complete a flight into Glasgow on his own when the First Officer left the flight deck after suffering a flying-related anxiety attack. After declaring a ‘PAN’ to ATC advising that the aircraft was being operated by only one pilot, the flight was completed without further event. The Investigation found that the First Officer had been “frightened” after the same Captain had been obliged to take control during his attempted landing the previous day and had “felt increasingly nervous” during his first ‘Pilot Flying’ task since the event the previous day.)
  • A320, vicinity Glasgow UK, 2008 (An Airbus A322 being operated by British Airways on a scheduled passenger flight from London Heathrow to Glasgow was being radar vectored in day IMC towards an ILS approach to runway 23 at destination when an EGPWS Mode 2 Hard Warning was received and the prescribed response promptly initiated by the flight crew with a climb to MSA.)
  • A321, Glasgow UK, 2019 (On 24 November 2019, as an Airbus A321 taking off from the 2665 metre-long runway 05 at Glasgow approached the calculated V1 with the flex thrust they had set, the aircraft was not accelerating as expected and they applied TOGA thrust. This resulted in the aircraft becoming airborne with less than 400 metres of runway remaining. The Investigation confirmed what the crew had subsequently discovered for themselves - that they had both made an identical error in their independent EFB performance calculations which the subsequent standard procedures and checks had not detected. The operator is reviewing its related checking procedures.)
  • AT43, vicinity Glasgow, UK 2012 (On 22 February 2012, the crew of an ATR 42 making a radar-vectored ILS approach to runway 23 at Glasgow at night allowed the airspeed of the aircraft to reduce and a stall warning followed. Corrective action then led to an overspeed and further corrective action almost led to a second stall warning. The Investigation concluded that SOPs were not followed, monitoring was ineffective and crew cooperation during recovery was poor. It was considered that crew performance may have been affected by inadequate rest prior to a night flying duty period.)
  • B738, Glasgow UK, 2012 (On 19 October 2012, a Jet2-operated Boeing 737-800 departing Glasgow made a high speed rejected take off when a strange smell became apparent in the flight deck and the senior cabin crew reported what appeared to be smoke in the cabin. The subsequent emergency evacuation resulted in one serious passenger injury. The Investigation was unable to conclusively identify a cause of the smoke and the also- detected burning smells but excess moisture in the air conditioning system was considered likely to have been a factor and the Operator subsequently made changes to its maintenance procedures.)

... further results