If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user
Actions
BOMBARDIER Challenger 300
From SKYbrary Wiki
CL30
| Aircraft | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Challenger 300 | ||||
| Manufacturer | BOMBARDIER | ||||
| Body | Narrow | ||||
| Wing | Fixed Wing | ||||
| Position | Low wing (winglets) | ||||
| Tail | T-tail | ||||
| WTC | Medium | ||||
| APC | C | ||||
| Type code | L2J | ||||
| Engine | Jet | ||||
| Engine count | Multi | ||||
| Position | Both sides of rear fuselage | ||||
| Landing gear | Tricycle retractable | ||||
| Mass group | 3 | ||||
|
| |||||
BOMBARDIER Challenger 300
Description
The Bombardier Challenger 300 is a super-mid-sized jet capable of traversing transcontinental distances. It is not developmentally related to the similarly-named Challenger 600-series, or the 600-derived Challenger 800-series.
Technical Data
| Wing span | 18.4 m60.367 ft |
|---|---|
| Length | 20.9 m68.57 ft |
| Height | 6.1 m20.013 ft |
| Powerplant | 2 x Honeywell HTF7000 turbofans, 30.4 kN thrust. |
| Engine model | Honeywell HTF7000 |
Performance Data
| Take-Off | Initial Climb (to 5000 ft) |
Initial Climb (to FL150) |
Initial Climb (to FL240) |
MACH Climb | Cruise | Initial Descent (to FL240) |
Descent (to FL100) |
Descent (FL100 & below) |
Approach | ||||||||||
| V2 (IAS) | kts | IAS | kts | IAS | kts | IAS | kts | MACH | TAS | 460 kts | MACH | IAS | kts | IAS | kts | Vapp (IAS) | 790 kts | ||
| Distance | 1500 m | ROC | ft/min | ROC | ft/min | ROC | ft/min | ROC | ft/min | MACH | 0.80 | ROD | ft/min | ROD | ft/min | MCS | kts | Distance | m |
| MTOW | 1700017,000 kg 17 tonnes kg |
Ceiling | FL450 | ROD | ft/min | APC | C | ||||||||||||
| WTC | M | Range | 31003,100 nm 5,741,200 m 5,741.2 km 18,835,958.019 ft NM |
||||||||||||||||
Accidents & Serious Incidents involving CL30
- CL30, en-route, north west of Moscow Russia, 2010 (On 23 December 2010 an aircraft climbing out of Moscow in night IMC experienced a sudden in-flight pitch upset in which the three unrestrained passengers were injured, one seriously, as a result of an inappropriate pilot response to an annunciation of autopilot stabiliser trim malfunction. Despite extensive inspection, no root cause of this malfunction, which had been transitory, could be found. Crew QRH guidance in respect of the fault experienced was found to be unhelpful and crew knowledge of pitch trim - which could have eliminated any pitch disturbance - was deficient.)