If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user

 Actions

CESSNA 421 Golden Eagle

From SKYbrary Wiki

C421
Aircraft
Name 421 Golden Eagle
Manufacturer CESSNA
Body Narrow
Wing Fixed Wing
Position Low wing
Tail Regular tail, mid set
WTC Light
APC B
Type code L2P
Engine Piston
Engine count Multi
Position (Front) Wing leading mounted
Landing gear Tricycle retractable
Mass group 2


Manufacturered as:

CESSNA Golden Eagle
CESSNA Executive Commuter
CESSNA 421
CESSNA 421 Golden Eagle
CESSNA 421 Executive Commuter


CESSNA 421 Golden Eagle

CESSNA 421 Golden Eagle CESSNA 421 Golden Eagle 3D

Description

Utility twin engine aircraft. In service since 1967. Pressurized development of CESSNA 411. Improved version CESSNA 421B Golden Eagle with lengthened nose and wing span. Last version (from 1975) CESSNA 421C with bonded wet wing, no tip tanks and higher vertical tail. Production ceased in 1985.

Technical Data

Wing span 12.2 m40.026 ft <br />
Length 10.3 m33.793 ft <br />
Height 3.6 m11.811 ft <br />
Powerplant 2 x 375 HP Continental GTSIO-520-H turbocharged piston engine with 3 blade propellers.
Engine model Continental O-520

Performance Data

Take-Off Initial Climb
(to 5000 ft)
Initial Climb
(to FL150)
Initial Climb
(to FL240)
MACH Climb Cruise Initial Descent
(to FL240)
Descent
(to FL100)
Descent (FL100
& below)
Approach
V2 (IAS) 100 kts IAS 130 kts IAS 150 kts IAS 150 kts MACH TAS 200 kts MACH IAS 190 kts IAS kts Vapp (IAS) 95 kts
Distance 600 m ROC 1500 ft/min ROC 1000 ft/min ROC 1000 ft/min ROC ft/min MACH ROD ft/min ROD 1000 ft/min MCS kts Distance 750 m
MTOW 31003,100 kg <br />3.1 tonnes <br /> kg Ceiling FL310 ROD ft/min APC B
WTC L Range 10001,000 nm <br />1,852,000 m <br />1,852 km <br />6,076,115.49 ft <br /> NM

Accidents & Serious Incidents involving C421

  • A310 / C421, en-route, northeast of Montréal Canada, 2018 (On 16 May 2018, an Airbus A310 and a Cessna 421 being positioned for ILS approaches to adjacent parallel runways at Montréal by different controllers lost separation. One controller incorrectly believed that he had transferred control of the Cessna to the other when the shift supervisor re-opened a sector which had been temporarily combined with his. The Investigation attributed the conflict to multiple deviations from standard procedures, memory lapses relating to controller information exchange of information and a loss of full situational awareness compounded by the shift supervisor also acting as an instructor whilst being distracted by his other duties.)