BOEING 767-200ER

Aircraft
Name	767-200ER
Manufacturer	BOEING
Body	Wide
Wing	Fixed Wing
Position	Low wing
Tail	Regular tail, mid set
WTC	Heavy
APC	D
Type code	L2J
RFF Category	7
Engine	Jet
Engine count	Multi
Position	Underwing mounted
Landing gear	Tricycle retractable
Mass group	4
Manufacturered as: BOEING 767-200 BOEING KC-767

BOEING 767-200ER

Description

Medium to long range wide-body airliner. In service since 1982 (200ER since 1984). Tandem development with 757. Exists in an ER (extended range) version for Extended Range Twin Engine Operation. The B762 is member of the B767 family of aircraft.

Technical Data

Wing span	47.6 m156.168 ft
Length	48.5 m159.121 ft
Height	15.9 m52.165 ft
Powerplant	2 x P&W PW4062 (281.6 kN) or 2 x GE CF6-80C2B7F (276.2 kN).
Engine model	General Electric CF6, Pratt & Whitney PW4000

Performance Data

Take-Off

Initial Climb (to 5000 ft)

Initial Climb (to FL150)

Initial Climb (to FL240)

MACH Climb

Cruise

Initial Descent (to FL240)

Descent (to FL100)

Descent (FL100 & below)

Approach

V2 (IAS)

160 kts

IAS

190 kts

IAS

290 kts

IAS

290 kts

MACH

0.78

TAS

470 kts

MACH

0.78

IAS

290 kts

IAS

kts

Vapp (IAS)

135 kts

Distance

2700 m

ROC

2000 ft/min

ROC

2500 ft/min

ROC

1400 ft/min

ROC

1500 ft/min

MACH

0.8

ROD

2000 ft/min

ROD

1600 ft/min

MCS

220 kts

Distance

1500 m

MTOW

179170179,170 kg 179.17 tonnes kg

Ceiling

FL430

ROD

ft/min

APC

D

WTC

H

Range

66006,600 nm 12,223,200 m 12,223.2 km 40,102,362.234 ft NM

Edit

Accidents & Serious Incidents involving B762

• B762 / A310, Toronto Canada, 2001 (On 23 October 2001, at Toronto Pearson Airport, a B767 cleared for take-off was forced to reject the take-off when a tractor towing an A310 crossed the runway ahead of it. The tractor had been cleared to cross the active runway by ATC.)
• B762, Los Angeles USA, 2006 (On June 2, 2006, an American Airlines Boeing 767-200ER fitted GE CF6-80A engines experienced an uncontained failure of the high pressure turbine (HPT) stage 1 disc in the No. 1 engine during a high-power ground run carried out in designated run up area at Los Angeles for maintenance purposes during daylight normal visibility conditions. The three maintenance personnel on board the aircraft as well as two observers on the ground were not injured but both engines and the aircraft sustained substantial damage from the fuel-fed fire which occurred as an indirect result of the failure.)
• B762, San Francisco CA USA, 2008 (On 28 June 2008 a Boeing 767-200 being operated as a Public Transport cargo flight by ABX Air (DHL) experienced a ground fire after loading had been completed and all doors closed and just before engine startup at night. The fire was located in the supernumerary compartment of the airplane. This compartment, which is present on some cargo airplanes, is located directly aft of the cockpit and forward of the main deck cargo compartment which is where the toilet, galley, and three non-flight crew seats are located (see diagram below).The flight crew evacuated the aircraft through the flight deck windows and were not injured, but the aircraft was substantially fire damaged and later classified as a hull loss.)
• B762, vicinity Busan Korea, 2002 (On 15 April 2002, a Boeing 767-200 attempting a circling approach at Busan in poor visibility crashed into terrain after failing to follow the prescribed procedure or go around when sight of the runway was lost. 129 of the 166 occupants were killed. The Investigation attributed the accident to actions and inactions of the pilots but noted that the aircraft operator bore considerable contextual responsibility for the poor crew performance. It was also concluded that ATC could have done more to manage the risk procedurally and tactically on the day and that ATM regulatory requirements did not adequately address risk.)