If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user


B738, en-route, Colorado Springs CO USA, 2006

From SKYbrary Wiki

B738 diversion into KCOS following in-flight fire. The fire started after a passenger's air purifier device caught fire whilst in use during the flight. The user received minor burns and the aircraft cabin sustained minor damage.
Event Details
When December 2006
Actual or Potential
Event Type
Fire Smoke and Fumes
Day/Night Night
Flight Conditions VMC
Flight Details
Aircraft BOEING 737-800
Operator Continental Airlines
Domicile United States
Type of Flight Public Transport (Passenger)
Origin Houston Intercontinental
Intended Destination Portland International Airport
Actual Destination Colorado Springs
Take off Commenced Yes
Flight Airborne Yes
Flight Completed Yes
Flight Phase Cruise
Location En-Route
Origin Houston Intercontinental
Destination Portland International Airport
Approx. near Colorado Springs, CO
Loading map...

Tag(s) Fire-Cabin Baggage origin
Tag(s) Hand held extinguisher used
Faulty or misused PED
Damage or injury Yes
Aircraft damage Minor
Injuries Few occupants
Causal Factor Group(s)
Safety Recommendation(s)
Group(s) None Made
Investigation Type
Type Independent


On 15 December 2006, a Boeing 737-800, being operated by Continental Airlines on a scheduled passenger flight made an emergency en route diversion to Colorado Springs, Colorado, after the cabin crew reported an in-flight fire. The flight had originated at Houston Texas and was en route to Portland, Oregon. Night Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC) prevailed at the time of the event.

The fire was started after a personal air purifier device, used by a passenger during the flight, exploded. The airplane sustained minor damage. One passenger received a minor burn injury. Six persons were transported to a local hospital. They were treated for smoke inhalation and released.

The Investigation

The device that initiated the fire was sent to National Transportation Safety Board (USA) (NTSB) for analysis.

The device, “According to a sales brochure, it "generates an intense electrostatic ion wind that charges floating particles in the 'breathing zone.' The particles are substantially repelled away from the wearer, creating an almost particle-free 'exclusion zone' for toxic allergens, smoke, dust, viruses, and bacteria. Perfumes and odours can also be minimized by the ion particle-charging-effect."

The Fire and Explosion Specialist's report included the following information:

"The unit originally came with a 3.6V CR123A size non-rechargeable lithium primary battery. A kit containing a charger and a rechargeable lithium-ion battery was also available for this unit."

Further on, the report included data from EDS analysis of the splatter that was found on the device. It showed the presence of manganese - manganese dioxide is a component of primary (non-rechargeable) lithium batteries.

“The specialist's report noted that in testimony given at NTSB public hearings on the hazards associated with primary and secondary lithium batteries, a short circuit was "the most common cause of battery fires. The short circuit can be caused either by design flaws, manufacturing defects or improper packaging and handling. Charging non-rechargeable batteries can result in an internal short that can lead to thermal runaway and battery failure. Batteries are generally not designed to be able to contain catastrophic failures, and when they go into thermal runaway they often explode and expel their contents to the environment potentially causing ignition in areas well beyond the initiating battery cell

Probable Cause

“The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this incident as follows. A short circuit in the primary (non-rechargeable) battery, most likely due to it being recharged. This internal short led to thermal runaway, battery failure, and an explosion.”

Related Articles

Further Reading