Flying a Visual Approach

From SKYbrary Wiki

Article Information
Category:	General
Content source:	Flight Safety Foundation
Content control:	EUROCONTROL

Contents 1 Description 2 Considerations 3 Related Articles 4 Further Reading

Description

Although a visual approach is the first type of approach normally taught to student pilots in light aircraft, this type of approach may be hazardous and careful consideration should be given before flying a visual approach in preference to an instrument approach, especially in a large aircraft.

Flight Safety Foundation (FSF) Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction (ALAR) Briefing Note 7.4 — Visual Approach makes the following recommendation:

"Accepting an air traffic control (ATC) clearance for a visual approach or requesting a visual approach should be balanced carefully against the following:

• Ceiling and visibility conditions;

• Darkness (light levels);

• Weather:
  • Wind, turbulence;
  • Rain or snow; and/or,
  • Fog or smoke;

• Crew experience with airport and airport environment:
  • Surrounding terrain; and/or,
  • Specific airport and runway hazards (obstructions, etc.); and,

• Runway visual aids:
  • Type of approach light system (ALS); and,
  • Availability of visual approach slope indicator (VASI) or precision approach path indicator (PAPI)."

Considerations

• If a published visual approach chart exists then it should be consulted prior to the approach being commenced.

• Any restrictions associated with visual approaches which are detailed in the Company Operations Manual must be complied with.

• Prior IFR flight status should never be cancelled when accepting a visual approach.

• When contemplating a visual approach, especially in poor visibility or by night, the flight crew should make themselves aware of the terrain in the aerodrome vicinity including obstacles such as high buidings and masts.

• A stabilised approach should be flown in accordance with Company SOPs and in any case to meet the laid down or generally accepted 'gate' criteria by 500 ft above aerodrome elevation. If this is not achieved, or if the approach becomes unstabilised below 500 ft, a go-around should be flown.

• Navigation aids for the runway in use and the flight management system (FMS) should be used to support navigation, enhance situational awareness and to cover the possible loss of adequate visual references.

• If a visual circuit is flown prior to a visual final approach, then it should be a standard rectangular circuit based on the runway orientation. The end of the downwind leg should be determined by timing from abeam the runway landing threshold by an appropriate amount dependent on airspeed. Bank angle in turns should not exceed Rate 1.

• The aircraft should be configured for landing in accordance with company SOPs - typically, at least landing gear and first stage flaps will be extended before the turn onto base leg.

• minimum safe altitude should be maintained until positive visua reference and position awareness has been obtained.

The FSF Briefing Note makes the following recommendations in respect of the final stages of the approach:

• "Resist the tendency to fly a continuous closing-in turn toward the runway threshold.

• "Before turning final (depending on the distance from the runway threshold), extend landing flaps and begin reducing to the target final approach speed.

• "Estimate the glide-path angle to the runway threshold based on available visual references (e.g., VASI) or raw data (ILS glideslope or altitude/distance). ...

• "Do not exceed a 30-degree bank angle when turning final.

• "Anticipate the crosswind effect (as applicable) to complete the turn correctly established on the extended runway centerline with the required drift correction.

• "Plan to be aligned with the runway (wings level) and stabilized at the final approach speed by 500 feet above airport elevation.

• "Monitor groundspeed variations (for wind shear awareness) and call altitudes and excessive flight-parameter deviations as for instrument approaches.

• "Maintain visual scanning toward the aiming point (typically 1,000 feet from the runway threshold) to avoid any tendency to inadvertently descend below the final approach path (use raw data or the VASI/PAPI, as available, for a cross-check)."

Related Articles

• European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (EAPPRE)

Further Reading

Flight Safety Foundation

• ALAR Briefing Note 7.4 - Visual Approach
• ALAR Briefing Note 5.3 - Visual Illusions